Court Adjourns Ruling on Sowore’s Bail Restoration Application to June 30

A Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned its ruling on an application filed by activist and former presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore, seeking the restoration of his bail in an ongoing case linked to comments he made about President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

Justice Mohammed Umar fixed June 30, 2026, for the ruling after hearing arguments from both the defense and prosecution regarding the application to reinstate Sowore’s bail following its revocation.

The case stems from statements allegedly made by Sowore on social media in which he described President Tinubu as a “criminal,” remarks that have become the subject of legal proceedings initiated by security authorities.

During the court session, Sowore’s legal team urged the court to restore his bail, arguing that the activist remains committed to defending himself in court and should not be kept in custody while awaiting the conclusion of the trial.

The defense maintained that the circumstances surrounding the revocation of his bail justified a review by the court, stressing that bail is a constitutional right intended to ensure a defendant’s appearance in court rather than serve as punishment before conviction.

Lawyers for Sowore further argued that granting the application would allow him to adequately prepare for his defense.

Counsel representing the prosecution opposed the request, insisting that the court acted within its powers when it revoked Sowore’s bail.

The prosecution argued that the activist failed to comply with certain conditions attached to his previous bail and urged the court to reject the application.

Government lawyers also maintained that the charges before the court remain serious and should proceed without interference.

Sowore was earlier remanded at the Kuje Correctional Centre after the court revoked his bail and issued a warrant leading to his arrest.

The Department of State Services (DSS) has since stated that it merely complied with the court’s directives, insisting that the decision to remand the activist was made by the judiciary and not the security agency.

The case has continued to attract significant public attention, with civil society groups, political commentators, and supporters closely monitoring developments.

The legal battle has reignited discussions about freedom of speech, political criticism, and the limits of public commentary in Nigeria.

Supporters of Sowore argue that public officials should be open to criticism in a democratic society, while others insist that allegations made against individuals, including public office holders, must be backed by evidence and remain within the bounds of the law.

Legal analysts say the court’s ruling on June 30 could influence the next phase of the trial and determine whether Sowore regains his freedom pending the determination of the substantive case.

The Federal High Court is expected to deliver its ruling on June 30, deciding whether Sowore’s bail will be restored or whether he will remain in custody as proceedings continue.

The outcome is likely to be closely watched by human rights groups, political observers, and legal stakeholders across the country.